Over The Hedge Rip
Animated movies are not simply for kids.Everyone knows that films like Toy Story 3 and The Incredibles 2 were made as much for the generation who grew up with the originals as for kids today.Though often light-hearted, animated movies are still a serious business. Six of the highest grossing animated movies have each made over $1 billion worldwide and eleven animated films are ranked among the top 50 worldwide highest-grossing films of all time.It is notable when animated movies made by different studios release suspiciously similar movies at very similar times. It leads to questions of who got in first? Who wore it better?It would be very easy to tote out a list of B-movies that are blatant ripoffs of more famous ones. No prizes for guessing which movies A Car’s Life, Frozen Land and What’s Up are aping. Instead, we are interested in similarities between movies you might have actually seen. Let’s face it, you would have to be mad to actually sit through those infamous copies.Your mileage may vary on some of these entries as, objectively, what you consider a better animated movie is down to personal taste and what you look for in a story.
When looked at through a lens of nostalgia, it is difficult to be objective.With that in mind, here are 15 Animated Movies That Ripped Off Better Ones. Antz and A Bug’s Life may very well have been the catalyst for the curious feud running through this list, where Pixar and DreamWorks release obviously similar movies at oddly similar times.Antz may have beaten A Bug’s Life to the theatres but when DreamWorks began working on their bug-based flick, Pixar was already deep into production on theirs.Antz essentially has the same premise as A Bug’s Life: an odd, misfit insect discovers that he is more than a faceless drone of an oppressive regime and goes on to great things. Antz was made faster and so skimped on animation quality but had plenty of gags and a cast of famous actors to paint over inadequacies with star power.During production, there was a public feud between DreamWorks co-founder Jeffrey Katzenberg and John Lasseter of Pixar over the controversial parallels.Despite such a shady start, both movies were largely positively received by audiences. 14 Coco / The Book of Life.
The announcement of Disney’s Coco was met with enthusiasm. The film boasts a gorgeous style, lively songs, and is a celebration of one of Mexico’s most iconic celebrations, The Day of the Dead.Though described by Pixar as a “ unique idea” done in the colourful style of Mexican folk art, many angry fans reminded the studio that this film was not so original after all.In 2014, 20th Century Fox released The Book of Life, a computer-animated musical made by Reel FX Creative Studios, also set during the Day of the Dead.
It had moderate success but those who did see it applauded it for the sensitive portrayal of the subject, beautiful animation, and exceptional soundtrack.Of course, there is no harm in enjoying two Day of the Dead inspired animations, but it would be unfair to forget about The Book of Life just because Disney steamrolls across the same ground. When DreamWorks release Over the Hedge in 2006, it did not exactly change the way we see animated movies. However, it at least gave audiences a raucous comedy about a con-artist racoon, an energetic squirrel, and their furry friends finding out that suburbia is encroaching on their woodland lives.Roll forward to 2014 and another film about a squirrel planning a heist of his human neighbours comes to the big screen. The Nut Job spent less time on characters and plot, and more time on bad puns about nuts.The Nut Job was received negatively by viewers. Of course, DreamWorks did not have exclusive rights to squirrel-related heists, but if you are going to re-tread such a similar story, at least make it funny.
12 Shark Tale / Finding Nemo. It was noticeable when fish-focused animated movies Finding Nemo and Shark Tale came out consecutively in 2003 and 2004.Comments were made on the similarity in theme and in interviews at the time DreamWorks Animation's CEO, Jeffrey Katzenberg, said: 'any similarities are mere coincidence. We've been open with the Pixar people so we don't step on each other's toes.' Granted, the plotlines of both films are very different. Could the two studios have just hit on a fun, promising setting concurrently?While Dreamwork’s Shark Tale features characters with adult problems, such as debt with loan sharks, Pixar's Finding Nemo is about parental love, a plot that young audiences could more easily identify with.It is undeniable that the two films have a lot in common. The adverse comparison between the more successful Finding Nemo and confusingly targeted Shark Tale means if they did copy Pixar’s premise, it didn’t work out so well. It followed a suspiciously similar formula to The Land Before Time, with long-neck dinosaurs for the protagonists, who lose parents and travel with a small band of friends to a greener haven, stalked by a 'Sharptooth.'
Although boasting stunning computer animated visuals, Dinosaur’s plot was generic. It aimed for a sweeping storyline but lacked enough emotion to make it feel epic. Perhaps if Disney had pulled off a decent movie, no one would have bothered to compare it to the clearly similar predecessor? Warner Brothers’ Happy Feet came out in 2006, with Sony’s Surf’s Up following closely on its stubby penguin tail in 2007.The similarities are obvious: both movies are about penguins.
But penguins are popular. There have been plenty of other movies cashing in on the fad, arguably started by March of the Penguins in 2005.In theme, the two movies have little in common. One is a mockumentary, looking into the annual Penguin World Surfing Championship. The other is a serious drama about environmentalism, religious fundamentalism, and accepting who you are.Although both well-received, neither film quite hits the mark.
Surf’s Up has a plot that could have worked just as well with humans rather than penguins, and Happy Feet has so many messages it gets confusing. 8 Treasure Planet / Titan A.E. Following the successful rise of Pixar, animation studios began making mostly CG films. This sort of trend does not happen overnight and there were a few bumps along the CG road. Disney’s Treasure Planet and Don Bluth’s Titan A.E.
Were two such bumps.Both movies combined hand-drawn traditional animation and 3D computer animation in a way that didn’t completely gel.They were also both animated sci-fi adventures featuring an angsty young hero in possession of an important map. The heroes join a motley spaceship crew, including a father-figure and a shady traitor, on an adventurous journey.The dystopian Titan A.E. Is certainly aimed at an older audience and gained something of a cult following. For the more light-hearted Treasure Planet, the goal is treasure, while in Titan A.E. It is a new home for the human race.
Yet the characterizations and the setting are so obviously similar that many fans noticed parallels. Based loosely on Vera Chapman’s ‘The King’s Damosel’, Warner Brother’s Quest for Camelot: The Magic Sword is an Arthurian tale in the same vein as Disney’s beloved The Sword in the Stone.In actual fact, besides the same setting and the importance of the same magical sword, the movies are quite different. It might be forgiven, if the rest of it wasn’t such a blatant Disney ripoff in every other way.With animated sidekicks, colorful musical numbers, and a plucky heroine who looks a lot like Belle (especially as she stands atop a cliff singing about how she wants something more), the film tries far too hard to fit the Disney formula.It has some redeeming features.
The voice acting is stellar, featuring talent such as Cary Elwes, Gary Oldman, and Pierce Brosnan, and some of the songs (notably Celine Dion’s 'The Prayer') had a popular life of their own outside of the mediocre film. In 1994, the little-known studio Crest Animation released The Swan Princess, a fairy tale musical based on Swan Lake. It ticks almost every box of a Disney classic: a beautiful princess, a handsome prince, catchy musical numbers, obnoxious talking animals, and an evil sorcerer. They even released a bunch of Swan Princess merchandise.The Swan Princess is based on no discernible movie. The small studio ripped off the Disney formula and hoped harassed parents would pick up the VHS, mistaking it for a Disney Princess movie.Perhaps this is why, years later, Disney got its revenge with The Princess and the Frog.
Angry fans of the smaller budget movie complained that the way Naveen (in frog form) looks and behaves similarly to Jean-Bob, Odette’s French frog friend, and the sphere of water when Facilier's spell is broken looks just like Odette’s transformation.Perhaps that make them even? 4 Atlantis: The Lost Empire / Nadia: The Secret of Blue Water.
Hayao Miyazaki, co-founder of Studio Ghibli, has given audiences such timeless masterpieces as Spirited Away, My Neighbour Totoro and Howl’s Moving Castle.Miyazaki also was the brain behind Nadia: The Secret of Blue Water, a Japanese steampunk series, originally aired from 1990 to 1991. Nadia ran for 39 episodes, and was later broadcast in the United States.A nerdy, academic, young man with big glasses and a bowtie searches for Atlantis, along the way falling in love with an exotic, strong heroine, in a high-tech submarine with a diverse crew. Once they discover Atlantis, the heroine uses her pendant to fuse with the magical power source and save the day.Sound familiar? Eagle-eyed animation fans have pointed out that Disney’s Atlantis, released in 2001, bears a shocking similarity to this set-up. Even the similarities between minor side characters and plot points are uncanny.
Disney’s 2013 Planes was already consciously a spin-off of Pixar's Cars franchise. The similarities between the movies about anthropomorphized vehicles competing in high-speed races, although undeniable, are on purpose. Despite not being produced by Pixar, the film was co-written and executively produced by Pixar and so this 'ripoff' was pre-approved.What was less valid was Lionsgate’s own direct to DVD movie Wings. Unlike many of the other direct, low-budget copies of well-known animations out there, this has a surprisingly recognizable Hollywood cast, including Josh Duhamel, Hilary Duff, and Rob Schneider.Like Planes, it features a plucky plane looking to compete in a famous race. That’s pretty much all there is to it.Planes was already a generic cash-in and the lower budget, hastily made Wings is all but unwatchable.
2 Shark Bait: The Reef / Shark Tale. Shark Bait is a 2006 South Korean-American CG animation. Izzie is an odd-ball fish who lives with her father Harold.
He tries hard to protect her from bullies and from being returned to the ocean by the human who maintains the aquarium. In a shock twist, Izzie and Harold do end up being returned to the sea, and are separated. The film centres on Izzie befriending the other fish as she and her father search for one another.With a suspiciously similar cover design, questionable voice acting, and mediocre animation, there is little to recommend this movie. This shameless cash grab is one of the most obvious.-Are there other animated ripoffs? Let us know in the comments! Screen Rant – Privacy PolicyWe respect your privacy and we are committed to safeguarding your privacy while online at oursite.
The following discloses the information gathering and dissemination practices for this Website.This Privacy Policy was last updated on May 10, 2018. Legal OwnershipScreen Rant (the “Website”) is owned and operated by Valnet inc. (“us” or “we”), a corporationincorporated under the laws of Canada, having its head office at 7405 Transcanada Highway,Suite 100, Saint Laurent, Quebec H4T 1Z2. Personal Data CollectedWhen you visit our Website, we collect certain information related to your device, such as yourIP address, what pages you visit on our Website, whether you were referred to by anotherwebsite, and at what time you accessed our Website.We do not collect any other type of personal data. If you are accessing our website through asocial media account, please refer to the social media provider’s privacy policy for informationregarding their data collection. Log FilesLike most standard Web site servers, we use log files.
This includes internet protocol (IP)addresses, browser type, internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, platform type,date/timestamp, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user’smovement in the aggregate, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use.
This article needs an improved. ( November 2015)In the wilderness of, a screams after Riggs drives past and throws a cigar at it. This causes an unnamed to signal a to release a boulder that pushes Riggs' car to the edge of a cliff, teetering back and forth. After that, the raccoon throws the cigar back to Riggs, who yells 'You're a bad raccoon!' The raccoon then blows the car down the cliff. Riggs quits Lyman Enterprises.As a result of Riggs' resignation, Dan Sanders , a real estate developer from, is brought in as his replacement.
He is given the task of turning the forest of Rocky Springs into a residential development by Lyman Enterprises' CEO Neal Lyman. This all transpires much to the objections of Dan's son, Tyler and wife Tammy , who are unhappy in Rocky Springs, missing their lives in Chicago.Unfortunately for Dan, the animals who are led by the raccoon refuse to sit back and watch.
They manage to turn the tables on him by disturbing his progress, interrupting his meetings, and humiliating him. Upon receiving some research from his love interest Amber , Tyler tells his father that Rocky Springs is a where he warns his father that 'many have tried to conquer it but they all fail.'
Following an attack by a bear that traps him in a tipped over, Dan signs orders to have a capture and cage all the animals.Meanwhile, Tammy is forced to plan an 'eco-friendly' fair with a senile teacher Mrs. Martin at the high school which is sponsored by Lyman's company, unaware of Lyman's plans to cut down the forest to and a shopping mall 'with a forest theme'. Dan, figuring this out, decides to set the animals free. Is the pirate bay site down. Once released the raccoon and his friends immediately wreak havoc on the eco fair, causing the guests and entertainers to flee while Mrs.
Martin talks to an owl.Lyman accidentally tranquilizes the sponsor for the construction, Mr. Gupta , after he attempted to break their deal. He flees into a with the animals in close pursuit. The animals began attacking him, as the bear drives a golf cart, pulling the tunnel away into a bush. After some convincing from Amber and Tammy, Tyler finally tells his father that he loves him.
Three months later, the forest is reclaimed as a nature preserve with Dan working as a park ranger. The poster promoting the forest preservation also states that anyone who violates the rules will be fined $1,000,000.00.During the credits, the humans and animals dance to the Transcenders version of '.' Cast.
as Dan Sanders. Fraser also appears uncredited as Tuka the Caveman, Sigrid the Viking, Jedediah the Puritan, and Terrence the Hippie, characters from Rocky Springs' folklore that had issues with the Raccoon's ancestors when they tried to settle Rocky Springs. Furry Vengeance was Fraser's final film as part of the agency, as he switched to the in 2010. as Tammy Sanders. Although initially skeptical due to Furry Vengeance being an animal film, Shields joined on the basis that she would work with Fraser. For the meat rabbit scene, Shields asked to have a statue made of real meat hit her face instead of a fake cardboard one; 'I didn't have a hamburger for a while after that,' Shields explained.
In order for the meat to not seep through the hands of a stunt person throwing the meat, they put a 'cardboard thing' on the prop; this resulted in Shields' braking her nose. Performing a scene where Sanders uses babble to communicate with a turkey expanded Shields' depth as a, describing it as 'not easy.' Shields also does an uncredited performance as the wife of Tuka the Caveman in the credits. as Tyler SandersThe son of Dan and Tammy. as Neil Lyman. as Felder. as Amber.
Scooby as the 'hero' raccoon, in an uncredited role, plays Riggs, a worker for Neil Lyman who quits following the raccoon's first attack. The construction workers include Ricky Garcia as Frank, as Hank, and as Gus.According to Norton, O'Neal was difficult to work with on Furry Vengeance: 'I was like the co-dependent wife. He was just embarrassing to be associated with. We had to go in and do our first meet with the director, and we had sat around all day. And I’m trying to like, 'Hey, we’re doing a movie!' And it’s a Brooke Shields movie, and we’re sitting down. And he’s just sitting there like 'Aahhhhhh.'
Everybody hated him on that shoot.' Plays Wilson, one of the officers, while portrays a Drill Sergeant.portrays Mrs.
Martin, an elderly senile school teacher and senior citizen; this was her final feature film role before her death from fall complications on November 30, 2016. Alexander Chance plays a security guard.The vocal effects of the animal were performed by, an experience he described as 'a lot of fun.'
Production Development. In addition to playing Dan Sanders, Fraser served as Furry Vengeance 's executive producer.On June 8, 2004, bought a by Carnes and Gilbert, Furry Vengeance, at a price of $750,000. Its premise of forest animals attacking a real estate developer was announced by the company;, Keith Goldberg and Michelle Weiss were also announced as supervisors., an actor Alterman previously work with, went on board to play the real estate developer on July 12. It would've been Carrell's first studio film where he received top billing. A May 6, 2007 article announced Carrell was replaced by.On January 26, 2009, was announced to play the lead character and to direct.
And were also revealed to co-finance and co-produce the film that same day, and Furry Vengeance would've be the two companies' first collaboration. It was also the first project Imagenation invested in as part of a $250 million production agreement with Participant signed in September 2008, where they would fund fifteen-to-eighteen of Participant's films over the course of five years.One of Kumble's major ideas included the creatures not speaking.was cast on June 10, 2009, with joining four days later. On July 8, and joined; the film was Shields' first role in a mainstream film since (1999). Was also announced to appear in the film that same day, although he doesn't make an appearance in the final cut.Furry Vengeance was initially planned to be released in July 2010, but it was changed to an April date.Filming Filming began on July 6, 2009.
Furry Vengeance had the lowest critical rating for a 2010 film until taken over by 's.reports that 7% of critics gave the film positive reviews based on 93 reviews and an average score of 2.5/10. The consensus is: 'A thin premise stretched far beyond serviceable length, Furry Vengeance subjects Brendan Fraser – and the audience – to 92 minutes of abuse.' Tim Ryan, who wrote for the site, wrote that despite the film's 'great premise,' 'critics say Furry Vengeance is no Over the Hedge; instead, it’s a mirthless, aggressively dumb family comedy that substitutes slapstick violence for laughs or a message. The pundits say any attempts at wit and satire are forcefully avoided; instead, sadistic, cartoonish violence is the order of the day, and the result is a painful experience for the whole family.' It was the lowest rated film of 2010 on the aggregate site, until the release of the film, which received a 6%., which assigned a 'generally unfavorable' of 23/100 based on 21 mainstream reviews, reported the film garnered 'some of the worst reviews for a major release this year.
The comedy is appallingly unfunny, the animation for the animals is both cheap and disturbing, and the movie could not be more obvious about its pro-environment message (and could not present it in a less appropriate manner). Many critics also appear to feel sorry for Fraser.' According to, 'the eco-friendly heart of the movie is unfortunately clumsy, and there's an even more laborious message about the importance of family and roots. Fraser's lantern-jawed mugging becomes irritating all too soon, although younger viewers may get a kick out of the ingenious antics of skunks, raccoons and grizzly bears as they get the better of numbskull humans.'
Critic negatively summarized Furry Vengeance as Over the Hedge through the lens of (2003), also writing Kumble 'somehow makes everything — the repeated (five times!) skunk blasts, the crotch-gnawing raccoons, the bear overturning the portable toilet with Fraser trapped inside — even less funny than you’d imagine.' Another Los Angeles Times reviewer called it a contender for the worst film of 2010: 'The plot offers the promise of good vibes and green energy as fuzzy creatures fight heartless developers. But the jokes are so feeble and the slapstick so silly that the mind goes numb. The sorry humans are led by a hapless Brendan Fraser.
His lame performance is a total embarrassment. Brooke Shields is less awful as his unhappy wife.' Labeled it an 'assault on common sense: 'The jokes wouldn’t pass muster on the, the story consists of an escalating series of critter attacks, and the previously mentioned special effects are surprisingly cheap-looking.
When Sanders isn’t fighting off funny animals, he’s jousting with funny ethnics: the obsequious Hispanic foreman, the overbearing Asian boss, the greedy Indian investor.' Jeong will 'occasionally speak in high-pitched Japanese, thus rendering Furry Vengeance both eco-friendly and vaguely racist,' wrote Robert Wilonsky. Mark Jenkins of explained, ' Furry Vengeance is poorly written, clumsily directed and sluggishly paced, but its essential problem is that it budgets 90 minutes on a gag that works better in 30-second spots.'
He also addressed, 'For fans of anthropomorphized animals, the cartoonish combat has its moments. But the CGI technique wears thin, and doesn't always work. Some of the action is too contrived to be charming, and the critter crowd scenes look like the work of someone who's had about 30 minutes of Photoshop training.'
As covered the film, 'We were really hoping that such an ecologically friendly, anti-big business movie wouldn’t feel so plastic. But. Brendan Fraser brings his standard big-lug shtick to a new low. he sustains bee stings, skunk sprays and groin blasts from badly computer-animated woodland creatures while enraging his nasty, racial stereotype of a boss.' Alicia Potter of bashed Furry Vengeance as 'violent, coarse, and mirthless.'
Among criticisms the 'wincing' performances, such as Jeong's 'racist role of Asian corporate baddie,' she also wrote, 'The casting of live animals that communicate via thought balloons and CGI-enhanced facial expressions charms at first, but since there’s no imagination behind the boulder rolling and the poop bombs, the critters grow wearisome.' In the opinion of Kurt Loder of, 'Brendan Fraser runs through an alarmingly extensive repertoire of low-comic muggery — face-scrunches, eye-rolls and general dingbat gibbering.'
He also wrote, 'In the end, of course, Dan finally gets it — the righteousness of the animals' cause and the error of his ways. We get it, too, naturally.
In fact we already got it 10 minutes into the movie.' 's Perry Seibert panned Furry Vengeance for its potty humor, the 'vindictive jerks' portrayal of the animals, Kumble's inability to 'let a gag build,' and Dan Sanders being not hate-able enough to deserve his torture.
Writer Martin Tsai also panned the presentation of its animal characters: 'the young children who are the film's target audience could easily get the impression from these creatures that wild animals don't need our protection. And the thought balloons here are just not nearly as amusing as subtitles when it comes to conveying animal communications.' He also wrote, 'Latent xenophobia is evident in the head developer being an Asian man who busts Bruce Lee moves and the investor being an Indian national. This racially tinged inversion of power dynamics is absurd.'
He called the closing credits scene the 'only inspired element' of the film. Jake Coyle called the film's use of real-life animals 'a tad hypocritical' for the environmental message of it as well as other Participant films like (2009). According to, the film's main problem was that it 'dependably panders across the board to the lowest common denominator, both in action and dialogue;' Kumble's directing 'abandoned any attempts at nuance, instead embracing flatly shot set piece histrionics.
Here he awkwardly blends CGI critter effects with animatronics and live-action work.' The film was also criticized for its use of some, especially and.Chuck Koplinski described the problem of the film's humor: 'how much you enjoy this film is dependent on how funny you think someone being thrashed around in a Porta-Potty is.' However, those ten and over 'will smile occasionally at this silly production and might be a bit impressed with the computer effects on display.' Allan Hunter of the summarized the film as 'a feeble family comedy that really tests your patience,' reasoning that 'Rarely in the field of slapstick can one actor have fallen on his backside so many times during a single film.' Summarized the film in two ways: as a 'collection of feeble jokes in the service of green themes' where the writing 'substitutes crude gags for humor at nearly every turn,' and as 'a jumble of Apple product placement and wan message-mongering, with a few anemic visual references to, and.'
Philip French of summarized the film as an 1950s ecological horror film masquerading as a comedy about protecting the environment: 'The hapless hero (Brendan Fraser) is treated with a degree of gleeful sadism not seen in a Hollywood comedy since, and his contemptuous wife is played by Brooke Shields, once a chilly child star in Pretty Baby, now a hatchet-faced matron. His Chinese-American employer brings in Mr Gupta, a rich Indian entrepreneur to help destroy the American environment, a scene that should play well in downtown Bhopal.' Also criticized Shields' performance, describing her as 'not a natural comic performer, to say the least. Her face has the comic mobility and expressiveness of an Easter Island statue.' Writer Scott Tobias appreciated its cast and 'surprisingly tough message about so-called “eco-friendly” companies and the green PR schemes they devise to paper over their destruction of the environment.' However, he was turned off by the premise of 'Brendan Fraser getting beat up by creepily anthropomorphized animals.' An critic praised the choice of non-speaking animals as Kumble's 'rare show of restraint' as well as the presence of comics like Bee and Kinsey; however, he found the cartoony comedy direction 'creepy in live action:' 'I’m not convinced that repeated assaults to the groin, bee stings to the eyes, raccoon pee in the mouth, or skunk stink sprayed head to toe is the way to teach ecological balance.'
However, Furry Vengeance did receive a decent review from: 'Fraser’s gift for goofball comedy gets a full workout, Brooke Shields proves game for a laugh, and there’s a decent subtext about corporate eco-hypocrisy. The CG-enhanced animals don’t talk, and the comedy is as broad as a barn — no face goes unsprayed by skunks, no crotch unsplashed by sprinklers — but kids, not to mention grown-up fans of knockabout comedy, will howl like hyenas.' Box office The film debuted at #5 at the box office, with an estimated $6.5 million during its opening weekend; although Summit distribution president Richie Fay reported a positive audience response, he also stated the opening weekend was below their expectations. The film went down to sixth place in the next weekend, where its gross amount was 40% less than the opening. At the end of its run, it came up with $32 million worldwide. Domestically grossing $17,630,465, it was the ninth biggest 2,000+-theater box office bomb of 2010.However, it has earned at least $3 million with DVD sales, debuting at number on 's rental chart.
The film was released in the on May 7, 2010, and opened on #2, behind. Accolades Furry Vengeance garnered a Worst Picture nomination from the, losing to. Shields and Jeong were also shortlisted for worst actor nominations ( and respectively) from the, although didn't make it.References Citations. Fritz, Ben (April 29, 2010). Retrieved April 30, 2010. Independent distributor Summit Entertainment is releasing the film, which it co-financed with Participant Media and Imagenation Abu Dhabi for about $35 million.
Massarella, Linda (March 27, 2011). Archived from on January 26, 2012.
GameCube
Retrieved December 12, 2019. ^ Brown, Phil (April 23, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019., event occurs at 0:52–1:10., event occurs at 1:16–1:18., event occurs at 1:22–1:27., event occurs at 1:20–1:21., event occurs at 2:20–2:50.
^ White, James (December 23, 2009). Retrieved December 11, 2019. Brawley, Eddie (December 18, 2015). Retrieved December 12, 2019. E.
Slotnik, Daniel (November 30, 2016). Retrieved December 2, 2019. Mouse Skywalker (May 21, 2010). DIS Unplugged. Retrieved December 2, 2019. Harris, Dana (June 8, 2004).
Retrieved December 10, 2019. D'Alessandro, Anthony (August 22, 2004).
Retrieved December 10, 2019. Fleming, Michael (July 12, 2004). Retrieved December 10, 2019. Fleming, Michael; Dunkley, Cathy (August 2, 2004). Retrieved December 10, 2019. Fleming, Michael (May 6, 2007). Retrieved December 10, 2019.
^ Fleming, Michael (January 26, 2009). Retrieved December 10, 2019. Jaafar, Ali (May 13, 2009). Retrieved December 10, 2019. A. Fernandez, Jay (June 10, 2009). Retrieved December 10, 2019.
^ A. Fernandez, Jay (June 14, 2009). The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved December 10, 2019. ^ Zeitchik, Steven (July 8, 2009). The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
Fleming, Michael (June 4, 2009). Retrieved December 10, 2019. Levin, Robert (February 25, 2009). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Weintraub, Steven (January 27, 2009). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Tyler, Josh (December 23, 2009).
Cinema Blend. Retrieved December 11, 2019. Knowles, Harry (December 23, 2009). Retrieved December 11, 2019. Fischer, Russ (December 22, 2009).
Retrieved December 12, 2019. The Hollywood Reporter. January 13, 2010. Retrieved December 10, 2019.
From the original on May 4, 2010. Retrieved December 12, 2019. Archived from on December 2, 2019.
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Chase, Jayni (June 28, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Wilonsky, Robert (April 27, 2010).
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Retrieved 2010-05-02. Ryan, Tim (April 30, 2010). Rotten Tomatoes.
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Sciretta, Peter (July 1, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Retrieved May 2, 2010. Dietz, Jason (April 29, 2010).
Over The Hedge Rabid Squirrel
Retrieved December 11, 2019. Staunton, Terry. Retrieved December 14, 2019. Whipp, Glenn (April 30, 2010).
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Perez, Susanne (May 7, 2010). Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 12, 2019. Hale, Mike (April 29, 2010).
The New York Times. Retrieved December 12, 2019. Wilonsky, Robert (April 27, 2010).
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Jenkins, Mark (April 29, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2019. Rosman, Lisa (May 3, 2010).
Retrieved December 13, 2019. Potter, Alicia (April 30, 2010). Archived from on March 17, 2013.
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Loder, Kurt (April 29, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019.
Seibert, Perry. Retrieved December 12, 2019. Tsai, Martin (April 30, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2019. Coyle, John (April 29, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Simon, Brent (April 29, 2010).
Retrieved December 12, 2019. Retrieved January 31, 2015. Koplinski, Chuck (May 6, 2010). Archived from on May 28, 2010. Retrieved December 14, 2019.
Hunter, Allan (May 7, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2019. Linden, Sheri (October 14, 2010). The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved December 13, 2019.
French, Philip (May 8, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2019.
(May 6, 2010). The Guardian.
Retrieved December 13, 2019. Tobias, Scott (April 29, 2010). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Schwarzbaum, Lisa (April 30, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2019.
Hughes, David (May 3, 2010). Retrieved December 14, 2019. DiOrio, Carl (May 2, 2010). The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved December 10, 2019. DiOrio, Carl (May 9, 2010). The Hollywood Reporter.
Retrieved December 10, 2019. Bundy, Brill. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 12, 2019. Retrieved 2010-05-02.
K. Arnold, Thomas (August 25, 2010). The Hollywood Reporter.
Retrieved December 10, 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2017. Marmaduke, Lauren (December 20, 2010). Retrieved December 11, 2019. O'Neil, Tom (January 5, 2011). Los Angeles Times. Retrieved December 12, 2019.Works cited Videos.
Laufer, Bonnie (May 27, 2013). Retrieved December 12, 2019. Parsons, Jeremy (2010).
Retrieved December 12, 2019.External links Wikiquote has quotations related to:. on. at. at. at.